I agree with the idea of ski_jump is not a sport. +1 Tobias
2014/1/23 Richard Z. <[email protected]> > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 01:33:41PM +0100, Janko Mihelić wrote: > > 2014/1/23 Richard Z. <[email protected]> > > > > > * sport=* is used for something different. His intention was to > describe > > > the > > > details of a technical structure, not to say what kind of sport > facility > > > it is. > > > Would you map ski-pistest with sport=*? How? > > > * 97 is a high percentage ski jump sites that were mapped. There is no > > > reason > > > to compare it with unrelated sports. > > > * sport=* is really lacking form many purposes, which is the reason > that > > > most > > > sports that can profit from detailed mapping don't use it. We don´t > mark > > > hiking > > > trails with sport=hiking, via ferrata's with sport=, waterways with > > > sport=kayaking. > > > > > > > In all those cases sport=* is used to describe what sport can be played > on > > a particular physical object. Sport=hiking is put on a highway=path, > > sport=kayaking is put on waterway=river. > > not even mentioned in the respective pages > * http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hiking > * http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Whitewater_sports > > Regarding cycling, is it a sport, leisure or just a mean of transportation? > Some ways should be marked with all three. > > > Following that logic, we should have sport=ski_jumping put on a > > leisure=ski_jump_hill. sport=ski_jump_take_off makes no sense, because > > that's not a sport, that is a facility. > > I think you listed two valid points in this paragraph but I don´t see > how they follow the same logic. They are just different uses for different > purposes. > > > Richard > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
