On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Andrew Guertin <[email protected]> wrote:
> landcover=forest > anywhere there's trees on the ground This doesn't agree with my (British English) understanding of the terms; a wood can be small, but a forest is always large. "Small" and "large" being loosely defined, but for something to be called "forest" I'd expect it to be many times larger than a typical farm field. Trying to pin down my intuition on it: a forest would be big enough to have one or more villages within its boundaries. However, the term "woodland" can be used at any scale, I think. __John _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
