On 09/24/2014 01:10 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2014-09-24 18:22 GMT+02:00 John Sturdy <[email protected]>:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Andrew Guertin
<[email protected]> wrote:
landcover=forest anywhere there's trees on the ground
there is already a proposal in the wiki and the key is in use:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/landcover#values
please not ~10k trees vs. 11 forest (i.e. factor 1000)
Sure, landcover=trees does seem better.
I wrote that out because it had been bouncing around in my head for a
while, but I hadn't put much research into it. I'm not surprised people
have pointed out problems with it (though I still think it's a good
starting point and an improved version would be a good way to fix our
problems).
--Andrew
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
