On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 4:02 PM, David Bannon <dban...@internode.on.net> wrote: > > To summarise discussion, structures like - > > amenity=campsite > campsite=waste_disposal > waste=chemical_toilet > > is a bit clumsy given how many tags are needed and how often it _should_ > be tagged. Further, many "sites" be they mining, camping, whatever are > large and identifying the particular node where the disposal point is is > of value. > > rubbish=chemical_toilet is, perhaps ambiguous. Do we like > rubbish_disposal= ???? waste_disposal= ??? > > Lets see some hands please ?
The mapping of "potability" for drinking water is in flux. However, toilet and drinking water tagging are well established already: amenity=campsite toilets=yes toilets:disposal=pitlatrine toilets:wheelchair=no drinking_water=yes These are appropriate for a campsite marked as a node. For a more detailed mapping the node can be expanded to an area, and each individual toilet and drinking water source mapped. For waste disposal I would suggest: amenity=campsite toilets=yes toilets:disposal=pitlatrine toilets:wheelchair=no drinking_water=yes *waste_disposal=yes*recycling:gas_bottles=yes Anything more complicated, and perhaps it's time for separate nodes.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
