On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 21:34 -0800, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: .... > The real question is what type of tag would attract rendering > support. amenity=dump_station is easier to deal with, > as it's a single level that maps to the commonly understood function > of a place to dump a sewage holding tank.
Bryce, I agree, my own interest here is I'm heading out on a trip, in an RV, in a couple of months. I'd like to map these things, need to know where they are. My particular interest here is camping and emptying my holding tank, but there is a huge list of other people who have some other pet need. I understand the community is (reportedly) reluctant to cater to each of those needs individually with yet another amenity tag. Maybe I am wrong, lets see who stands up ? > There is a common icon: > http://www.broomfield.org/images/pages/N331/blue%20heading%20icons_rv% > 20dump.png > Truth is, we'll need a lot of use before the rendering people can help. > amenity=waste_disposal + waste=chemical_toilet > is a nested tag, and far less clear. Someone searching for a preset > for this might not find it. And it's not entirely > clear exactly what the waste is (the toilet or the contents of the > toilet)? Not sure I agree. If we document it properly, its searchable and pretty easy to tag. And we say "amenity=waste_disposal and the waste is XXX". Agree I'd prefer a high level tag but its not bad like that, really. David _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
