On 17/02/2015 6:45 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 4:02 PM, David Bannon
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> To summarise discussion, structures like -
>
> amenity=campsite
> campsite=waste_disposal
> waste=chemical_toilet
>
> is a bit clumsy given how many tags are needed and how often it _should_
> be tagged. Further, many "sites" be they mining, camping, whatever are
> large and identifying the particular node where the disposal point is is
> of value.
>
> rubbish=chemical_toilet is, perhaps ambiguous. Do we like
> rubbish_disposal= ???? waste_disposal= ???
>
> Lets see some hands please ?
The mapping of "potability" for drinking water is in flux.
However, toilet and drinking water tagging are well established already:
amenity=campsite
toilets=yes
toilets:disposal=pitlatrine
toilets:wheelchair=no
drinking_water=yes
These are appropriate for a campsite marked as a node. For a more
detailed mapping the node can be expanded
to an area, and each individual toilet and drinking water source mapped.
For waste disposal I would suggest:
amenity=campsite
toilets=yes
toilets:disposal=pitlatrine
toilets:wheelchair=no
drinking_water=yes
*waste_disposal=yes
*recycling:gas_bottles=yes
Anything more complicated, and perhaps it's time for separate nodes.
_______________
Waste colleting is wider than just camping sites. And that is the point
of consdering it as a new high level tag. The porposal may have come out
of consderation of camp sites .. but it has much wider use and so should
not be considered as just for camping sites.
Your suggested tag waste_disposal=yes .. would need further expansion ..
bin for 'household refuse'?, bin for recycling, human waste collection
point from a chemical toilet, etc, etc ...
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
