I have updated the proposal <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/camp_site%3D*> with the feedback as much as possible.
Met vriendelijke groet/with kind regards, *Jan van Bekkum* www.DeEinderVoorbij.nl On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 1:55 PM, John Willis <jo...@mac.com> wrote: > > I understand the risk of confusion, but: > > A - if there is any "informal" kind of tag there would be people who tag > particularly good sites to pitch a tent in national parks or whatnot with > them, and though I can only think of a couple myself I'd consider good > enough to map, people will want to share this as soon as they see > "informal" is available, so... > > B - I don't want informal - either turnout car-camping, hotel adjacent > camping, nor random trekking camp clearings confused in any way with > proper, designated, car-camping /tent camping / caravan facilities - and > giving people a couple extra tag values is going the reduce confusion so > the actual maintained camp sites are labeled and marked correctly by > taggers. I thought about the few car camping ("auto camp") / tent camping > sites I'd seen in Japan recently and thought about how I would tag those, > and the thoughts about tent platforms came to mind, for example, same with > tagging their immaculate kitchens and amenities in another thread. > > I'm not a big camper anymore, nor campsite tagger, but I have been on > hundreds of camping trips, covering every facility mentioned several times > over (save RV/caravan sites) and there seems to be big distinctions between > all the kinds I mentioned - and being able to convey those in tags seems > relevant - though maybe my input is not as important because I'm not so > interested in tagging those kind of sites. > > I hope my input was helpful, I will be voting yes on whatever is decided. > > Javbw > > > On Mar 15, 2015, at 8:46 PM, sly (sylvain letuffe) <lis...@letuffe.org> > wrote: > > > > dieterdreist wrote > >>> Am 14.03.2015 um 05:41 schrieb John Willis < > > > >> johnw@ > > > >> >: > >>> > >>> and mapping them for other Trekkers would be useful only if they are > not > >>> confused at all with all of the other, more substatial or easily > accessed > >>> spots in a camp or along a road. > >> > >> +1, I believe the tag for informal camping spots should not just be a > sub > >> key added to the same tag as for a commercial or otherwise official camp > >> site, it should be a different main tag > > > > +1 from me as well. Too much risks of confusion of too different > concepts. > > (Please note that I just discovered on that page the existence of > > impromptu=yes which imho should be warned against on the wiki, and given > > it's rather low usage (400) after 8 years of existence, could also be > marked > > as proposed for deprecation in favor of another tourism=x top tag > > > > > > > > ----- > > -- > > sly, contact direct : sylvain /a\ letuffe o r g > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Sletuffe > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Tagging-established-unofficial-and-wild-campings-tp5834677p5837225.html > > Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Tagging mailing list > > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging