> Am 24.05.2015 um 14:36 schrieb John Willis <jo...@mac.com>: > > I always thought a cascade is a series of waterfalls connected together. I thought it was a word for a single waterfall as well... > > Also - saying a waterfall is a reflecting pool is very disingenuous - it's > not "that" it reflects - it's *what* it reflects - usually some kind of > scenery or famous architecture. in particular, a waterfall is not a pool. Reflection of light is what it makes look interesting (glitter) cheers Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
- Re: [Tagging] Water featuers Richard Z.
- Re: [Tagging] Water featuers John F. Eldredge
- Re: [Tagging] Water featuers Richard Z.
- Re: [Tagging] Water featuers Dave Swarthout
- Re: [Tagging] Water featuers Andy Mabbett
- Re: [Tagging] Water featuers Andy Mabbett
- Re: [Tagging] Water featuers Dave Swarthout
- Re: [Tagging] Water featuers Richard Z.
- Re: [Tagging] Water featuers pmailkeey .
- Re: [Tagging] Water featuers John Willis
- Re: [Tagging] Water featuers Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Tagging] Water featuers pmailkeey .
- Re: [Tagging] Water featuers John Willis
- Re: [Tagging] Water featuers Richard
- Re: [Tagging] Water featuers Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Tagging] Water featuers Richard
- Re: [Tagging] Water featuers Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Tagging] Water featuers Martin Koppenhoefer