We have something similar in Korea. I have been using (and recommending) highway=service.
They're not really tracks, as they are proper roads, with a concrete or tarmac surface, But, they don't really go anywhere. I change the tags when the road actually becomes a track (two lines of worn dirt where the tractor wheels go). I think it's an accurate representation, and it renders nicely in most views too. Andrew On 08/07/2015, Paul Norman <[email protected]> wrote: > On 7/8/2015 1:25 AM, johnw wrote: > [trimmed] >> The issue is that these “small windy roads that go everywhere” go >> nowhere. the land they access is for farming the subdivided sections >> ... lead you on a tour of the local rice plots and hills. >> >> it is basically access for the farmers, which then have a network of >> (private?) tracks and paths that break the sections down further. >> >> they just loop around a big rice field, or connect to other roads >> which service other rice fields or logging plots: nothing of interest >> - not even a house - is there. Only the local farmers need use of >> them, but they are public. >> >> it’s the purpose of the road - the lack of shoulders and other road >> standards, and expected curves, turns, and other “classifications” of >> the road. > > From what you've said about the purpose, it sounds like highway=track. > The conditions (paved or not, etc) would then dictate the tracktype and > other tags. > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
