I have seen some people insist that highway=track only be used if the
landuse Is farmland, but not if the land is covered by bushes or trees
because no cultivation is taking place.
--
John F. Eldredge -- [email protected]
"Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot
drive out hate; only love can do that." -- Martin Luther King, Jr.
On July 8, 2015 6:06:21 AM moltonel 3x Combo <[email protected]> wrote:
On 08/07/2015, johnw <[email protected]> wrote:
>
https://www.google.com/maps/@36.431238,139.246753,3a,78y,233.04h,65.44t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sqk2OIIDRfkCjb8uqWNbkhw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656!6m1!1e1
To me this (along with the description) is highway=track
tracktype=grade1. You can add surface, lanes, maxspeed, width, etc for
good measure.
The difference between track and service is not about the quality of
the road, but about its intended purpose. Track for agrigulture,
service for built up areas (very simplified). It's the same for all
highway=* values : the purpose and official classification are more
important criterias than the road quality. Which makes the secondary
tags even more usefull.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
