|
On 2015-09-09 23:39, moltonel wrote :
You are off topic, as well as the following messages.On 9 September 2015 21:46:54 GMT+01:00, "André Pirard" <a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:There are various reasons for warning other mappers to be careful about their updates. I once temporarily overlaid two walking routes to show the effect of displaying two sorts of icons. Or I left in for a while drawing errors of a plugin as the best way to show the author what I talk about. Despite a don't touch note explaining why, a good soul passes, not reading note and makes a "correction".Please run experiments like this on a test db, not on the main one. It's easy to point your editor to dev.openstreetmap.org for example (quoting from memory, not 100% sure). You never know when a data consumer will stumble upon your experiment, live or in a downloaded snapshot. Nobody expects osm data to be perfect all the time, but there's no point in knowingly making it worse. While I admit that my examples are suboptimal, the matter is extending very simply to other tags the idea of preventing to replace precisely triangulated coordinates by loose GPS ones. Let us, for a better example, say that someone tagged a strange looking name and that he knows for sure that the spelling is correct. After the third time the name was changed to a apparently better but wrong spelling, he will want to enforce reading the note that nobody reads. That's all there is to the suggestion you removed from this message. Now responding to your accusations. What big sin is that to discover errors and leave them a few more days on the map for the developer of the tool that produced them to have a look at them? Is there a prescribed time limit? Like you, I have always advocated a sandbox, especially for helping novices. I've never heard of one and it's the first time I do. But JOSM says "The server responds with the return code 404 instead of 200. " when trying to validate http://dev.openstreetmap.org/ as well as http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ Thanks, but please give correct information. But a sandbox wouldn't help with the first bad example because it's to be looked at on Waymarked trails and that program does not display sandbox data. And as we're told that those URL if they worked wouldn't have a renderer, they wouldn't be very convenient to use. Please make practical suggestions !!! On 2015-09-10 18:41, Kotya Karapetyan wrote : That is what my suggestion does and I wonder why the heck it has been removed from this message !!! It would produce a message saying something like: "The coordinates you are trying to change are accurate to 25 cm. You probably shouldn't change this tag, certainly not with GPS data. Are you certain that you will not destroy valuable data and do you want to continue?". And if he replies "no", his attempt is canceled. This kind of message would be possible for any tag and I don't understand why you want it to be specific. What elegance does it lack? You should explain. It allows to make updates to better that 25 cm. We know that it's typical of OSM to be crowded with stupid vandalism ("can I erase what I don't understand?"), even the DWG changing names to spelling mistakes i could explain, but someone defying such a warning should be banned for life. Why was my text removed? Cheers
|
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
