Hi, I want to thank all of you for the input. I think it is common sense (now) that tunnel=culvert should be used on ways only, so I'd be happy to see the wiki pages changed so that they don't suggest to use the tag on a node. Who can do that?
Gerd ________________________________________ Von: Florian Lohoff <[email protected]> Gesendet: Sonntag, 25. Oktober 2015 14:39 An: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Betreff: Re: [Tagging] tunnel=culvert On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 10:20:10AM +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote: > I don't think that this is a strong point. > Thinking about my own edits I'd say that the > length could be +/- 4m because typically I just try to place > the nodes somewhere neer the road, if I find an existing > node that looks good enough I use that. > On the other hand, I think we make > assumptions about the width of the road based on its > type (primary, secondary ,etc), > so this assumption would also apply on the culvert. So we implicitly assume a width of a road now we propagate this fault to all attached objects? We should reduce errors by implicitly assuming something not increase them. Flo -- Florian Lohoff [email protected] We need to self-defend - GnuPG/PGP enable your email today! _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
