On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 02:39:47PM +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 10:20:10AM +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote: > > I don't think that this is a strong point. > > Thinking about my own edits I'd say that the > > length could be +/- 4m because typically I just try to place > > the nodes somewhere neer the road, if I find an existing > > node that looks good enough I use that. > > On the other hand, I think we make > > assumptions about the width of the road based on its > > type (primary, secondary ,etc), > > so this assumption would also apply on the culvert. > > So we implicitly assume a width of a road now we propagate > this fault to all attached objects? > > We should reduce errors by implicitly assuming something not > increase them.
agreed. But this is open-STREET-map so perhaps the streets should be fixed first. Does not make much sense to map culverts with sub-meter precission while freeways are still linear ways. Richard _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
