@Martin: Hm. The traffic_partks over here are traffic training facilities. Training=cycling sounds to me like learning how to ride a bike (which is in fact a prerequisite).
2018-04-23 13:03 GMT+02:00 Paul Allen <[email protected]>: > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> I would prefer a long descriptive term (like: "cycling_training_area") >> over a nice artificial word like "bicycle_town" which creates more >> questions than it answers. >> > > I agree completely about needing a descriptive term. From the wikipedia > page mentioned earlier in the thread it's clear > that different countries have different names for it and none of those > names are self-explanatory. Terms that are > self-explanatory mean that people using an editor can look through a list > of possible values and it's obvious which > one to use without having to resort to the OSM wiki. > > I'd prefer something more structured than duck tagging a crowded amenity > tag, simply because we're likely to > encounter more types of training as time goes by. amenity=training + > training=cycling works for me. Well, > for something private like a room with expensive flight simulators used by > airlines then I'd say it's more of > a facility than an amenity (you can't just walk in, hand over some money > and have a play) but access=private > lets us use amenity anyway (even for NASA's astronaut training facilities). > > -- > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > -- Vr gr Peter Elderson
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
