Ok, it's clear that these tags are not deprecated. Are they "in use" then?
According to https://taghistory.raifer.tech they've both increased in number by about 3500 features in the past 12 months. In comparison, disused:shop=* has been added about 3000 times in the same time period. On 7/29/19, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote: > Am Mo., 29. Juli 2019 um 14:43 Uhr schrieb Andy Townsend <[email protected] >>: > >> On 29/07/2019 13:05, Paul Allen wrote: >> >> >> It applies to more than just quarries. The problem is that the >> namespaced >> version, when >> applied to physical objects, renders them invisible (on standard carto). >> >> Please let's just stop worrying about just that one renderer... >> > > > it is not just one renderer, OSM-Carto is often seen as standard > implementation and a lot of people are taking it as template when they > develop their own style. Generally the vast majority of data consumers does > neither look at disused / abandoned=yes qualifiers, nor at them as > prefixes. This applies to routing engines, rendering rules and all other > kind of data consumers. Maybe there is someone looking at these "details", > but most don't. > > > As already mentioned the tricky bit is working out what "disused" means for >> e.g. a quarry. A map that wanted to show actual places where rock was >> extracted wouldn't show an inactive hole in the ground, whereas one that >> wanted to show holes in the ground would still show them. >> > > > that's a problem of tagging then. "landuse" is not suitable to represent a > business. You need an additional tag for this. It might work as a shortcut > in simple cases, but it is not generally working and is not in analogy to > how we map factories or other industrial landuses for example. > > Cheers, > Martin > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
