I've added amenity=bear_box (for the feature) and bear_box=yes (as a
property to add to campsites, caravan sites, camp pitches, etc) to the
proposal at 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Campsite_properties
for now. i

If it turns out to be too controversial I can remove it for a separate
proposal, but I think this is a clear and simple way to tag these
features, since the ideas of tagging similar features that might not
be bear-proof are still hypothetical, and it's fine to use different
tags for different yet similar things.

On 8/24/19, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 1:12 PM Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 at 18:43, Dave Swarthout <daveswarth...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Still, if we want to allow for easy expansion of the tagging scheme then
>>> using waste_basket=bear-proof, for example, would help such future
>>> expansion.
>>>
>>
>> How about bear_proof=yes which could be applied to food storage
>> containers
>> and waste
>> containers?  Ummm, we'd probably also need vermin_proof=yes for mice/rat
>> proof
>> containers.
>>
>
> This is why I offered the "hardened=yes" suggestion above.
>

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to