I'm in no way supporting the proposal, but this argument of 'it'll make the entities look fully up to date" is illogical. If taken to it's conclusion, nothing will ever be update again.

It's false to think that just because an entity was amended yesterday, it means it's up to date: If a typo in a road's name is amended, but the road is left incorrectly tagged as 'tertiary' instead of 'primary' it's not up to date.

Likewise an entity previously amended 10 years ago doesn't mean it's inaccurate.

DaveF


On 18/10/2020 22:04, Oliver Simmons wrote:
Doing this would make over 3M objects have their date updated to the present, when the last meaningful change may have been over 5 years ago. It creates the illusion of data being up-to-date when all that was changed was a tag key.


On Sun, 18 Oct 2020, 22:02 Graeme Fitzpatrick, <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:




    On Sun, 18 Oct 2020 at 20:39, Rory McCann <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        *definitely* not something one does auomatically.


    But would it be so impossible? (Not suggesting that it should
    actually be done!)

    Couldn't a bot be set to simply find all cases of man_made=,
    regardless of what it is, & change them to human_made=, similar to
    using Find & Replace in a Word document?

    & no, as you can see, I don't understand the technicalities behind
    it all, so please be gentle with explaining that I'm an idiot! :-)

    Thanks

    Graeme

    _______________________________________________
    Tagging mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to