Nov 22, 2020, 19:00 by

> I'm surprised you think that as you were a contributor to the discussions:
This is a closed, not implemented PR. So it is not a case of
"OSM-carto demanding boundaries on ways".

Yes, long time ago there was a problematic idea that was abandoned.

Describing something like that over two years later as 
"OSM-carto demanding boundaries on ways" - in present tense and 
with claim that it is technical issue caused by incompetent programmers
is misleading at best.
Tagging mailing list

Reply via email to