Nov 24, 2020, 01:24 by tagging@openstreetmap.org: > > > On 22/11/2020 22:27, Christoph Hormann wrote: > >> Exactly. It also shows how we in OSM traditionally make decisions about >> tagging. An idea to change tagging practice was suggested - on an open >> channel for everyone to read and comment on without hurdles and with an >> archive that allows us now to read up on things years later. It was >> discussed and arguments and reasoning were provided both for and against the >> idea and based on that we reached consensus that it was a bad idea and it >> was abandoned. >> > > Yes, but the demand was still made & the solution of writing competent code > to enable the proposal was never implemented, so your point is? > You claim was that: - this code is trivially easy to implement - that developers failed to do so "purely because they can't be bothered/not competent enough" - and presented as something happening right now, without mention that it refers to something suggested/proposed/demanded year ago and abandoned also years ago And you topped it with "if developers are offended at receiving suggestions on how to improve their software, or even have it criticized, then they should rescind it." Yes, I am offended. But it was not a suggestion. It was a baseless insult and misrepresentation of a situation, that is generally not useful or desirable.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
