Looks good to me. Simon
Am 01.02.2018 um 12:08 schrieb Joel H.: > > Hi All! I have made a response to DNRM, regarding the licensing for > locality boarders. Please give a critique before I send! > > > /Hello [NAME],// > // > //Thank you for your time and consideration regarding the approval for > OpenStreetMap.// > // > //As a response to your concern over the licence change, it isn’t > necessary for DNRM data to be re-licenced as a result of usage in > OpenStreetMap. It’s simply about signing a waiver to clarify minor > differences in licences. Approving usage in OSM shouldn’t tamper with > the goals of DNRM since OSM uses a very similar licence with many of > the same philosophical views.// > // > //The first part that needs approval is whether or not you think our > method of Attribution, is sufficient with the “reasonable manner” > requirement of the CC-BY 4.0. We credit sources through the following > page: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors, It’s also > possible to add sources to the objects which are DNRM’s data.// > // > //The second is to waive Section 2(a)(5)(B) of the CC// > //BY 4.0 license as to OpenStreetMap and its users with the > understanding that// > //the Open Database License 1.0 requires open access or parallel > distribution of// > //OpenStreetMap data.// > // > //Many organisations such as Brisbane City Council and New South Wales > Land and Property Information, have already given permission in the > same way that DNRM could.// > // > //I hope you take the time to reconsider. I’ve attached the PDF that > is needed for your review, keep in touch.// > // > // > //Joel Hansen// > //Local OpenStreetMap Editor/ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
