Does it need the "7k" in there as well? Thanks
Graeme On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 13:54, Andrew Harvey <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 12:44, Andrew Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Looking good. Given... >> >> Node: traffic_sign=AU:R6-22 >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3227568911 >> >> Way: low_gears:hgv=designated >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245284221 >> >> Question: >> >> The tagging of the way.... does not use the AU:R6-22 (signage) code. Can >> anyone elaborate on why this is? They seem like conflicting tagging >> schemes. >> > > You can if you like > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign#On_a_way_or_area. > > One is tagging the exact sign (which is specific to Australia), the other > is tagging the restriction which the sign creates on the way (which could > apply globally). > > Would someone be able to review this tagging... >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132233374 > > > That looks okay. The wiki does say > > In case of multiple signs separated by commas or semicolons, the prefix > should appear only once at the beginning (except if signs from different > prefixes are combined). > > Which would be traffic_sign=AU:R6-22,G9-83 > > but how you have it should also be acceptable. > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
