Agree, but still would think both are better. Plus, it's difficult to tag the way(s), as we don't necessarily know where the 7% ends. Whereas the sign is a single point location and can be easily geographical tagged.
On Thu, 9 Feb 2023, 8:03 pm Warin, <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 8/2/23 16:07, Andrew Hughes wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > Thanks for the quick responses! > > Andrew Harvey: traffic_sign=AU:R6-22,G9-83 seems better than > traffic_sign=AU:R6-22;AU:G9-83 but I can see why you say both would be > valid. > Q: Let's say there is also another sign "Zombies Ahead" that doesn't have > a NTC code at the same location. Would that be separated with a semi-colon? > and tagged as.... traffic_sign=AU:R6-22,G9-83;Zombies Ahead > > Graeme, ideally the "7km" is recorded in the tagging... mostly because > some juro's do this so they don't need to place "end of .... signage". But > on that subject.... > Q: lots of signage such as G9-82 (see > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Road_signs_in_Australia ) also includes the > % slope. This is perhaps similar to the "7km" supplementary information on > the sign and perhaps the same convention could apply to both. For example > https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-35.05425945999999&lng=138.53492903000006&z=19.9&trafficSign%5B%5D=all&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&pKey=798881551059257&focus=photo&x=0.49105747415321865&y=0.5517154385592334&zoom=0 > > > The '% slope' would be the key 'incline' that can simply be applied to the > road way. > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
