I thought I'd see if the tagging details in the US Trail Access Project
link might be useful for Australia.
I tagged all of the tracks out at Kanangra - mainly because it has a mix
of tracks, but few enough that it's easy to cover them all - with
operator=NPWS or informal as appropriate. Basically the maintained ones
with operator tags, others as informal.
I know Gaia (for example) renders informal tracks with less priority
than formal tracks, though I don't know exactly the combinations of tags
they are focussing on. I believe they refresh their tiles every 2-3
weeks so I'll have a look again in a few weeks.
If you're into mapping bush tracks, I hacked an Overpass Turbo query
which does a pretty good job of visualising some of the useful tags (and
where tags are missing). Happy to share.
cheers
Tom
----
Canyoning? try http://ozultimate.com/canyoning
Bushwalking? try http://bushwalkingnsw.com
On 24/02/2024 8:10 am, Mark Pulley wrote:
I had suggested changing to access=no, or adding a disused: prefix (mainly to
keep NPWS happy), but looking at this page, the recommendation seems to be to
keep the tags as they are now (access=discouraged, informal=yes).
Mark P.
On 23 Feb 2024, at 7:29 pm, Tom Brennan <[email protected]> wrote:
Given this thread is still going, the US has a useful collaboration resource
between mappers and land managers
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Trail_Access_Project
cheers
Tom
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
