On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 02:57:05PM +0100, Wouter Hamelinck wrote: > If you really want to use it as a geographical definition for the > communities, why would you use the one from art127 and not the ones > from articles 128 or 129? Especially 129 doesn't mention Brussels.
Please note that 129 is about languages. It basicly doesn't allow the communities to say what language should be used in Brussels because it's bilingual. Maybe I wasn't clear enough, but I have always had a problem with mapping the communities in the first place since they are about the person and not the land. But there are people that want to map that. And if we're going to map them than we should try to do it as correctly as possible. Kurt _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
