> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Thomas Bertels <tbert...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> From https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/restaurant%3Atype%3Ait it seems
>> that those should be replaced by cuisine=italian etc.
>>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> But unlike a real pub (a "café" in Dutch and French - or "bruine
>>>> kroeg"), you can get a decent meal in a brasserie, or ice cream,
>>>> pancakes around 4pm etc. So the focus is much more on food imho.
>>>> So are you suggesting that amenity=pub; food=yes is better ?
I feel that we could use :
amenity=pub food=yes cuisine=brasserie
restaurant:type is too liked to linked to restaurant
it also describe the same function for a brasserie, a hotel, ...
restaurant:type:it is also strange.. what if you want to describe the
different type of pizzeria's in Belgium ? did you need to use "it" or
"be" subtag ? I think that cuisine=italian/subtype is a more flexible
way to tag them without being blocked by the conflict type of cooking
and contry/langage where the poi is located
Talk-be mailing list