Phillip Barnett wrote: > Potlatch is still offering Opendata as a layer, with no warning as to the > potential problem vis a vis existing contributions. Shouldn't we be > dropping this rather quickly?
I like the "we" there - much better than the usual "Richard". Really looking forward to the patch to the API so that users can retrieve their own CT status, and the patch to Potlatch's background layer selector to take account of this. Plus a manual override for users who are aware of what's substantial and what isn't, so therefore know what they can legitimately use. And the resulting Potlatch testing and recompile, plus submitting it through this bizarre git thing which the Rails port now appears to use (and which I still haven't figured out). All "rather quickly". No? Ah well, it was a nice thought. Assuming no-one steps up to the plate and codes, tests and submits a patch, I'll look at it (and NearMap too) next week or so when I'm not on deadline with the day job. But I have every confidence that the issue, which is trivial and easily fixable by a slight clarification to the CTs will be fixed soon at any rate. I realise the scaremongers (not you, Phillip) will then have to find something else to wibble about, but hey. Sometimes I think we need Michael Winner on these licence threads to come and say "calm down, dear" at regular intervals. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/The-last-2-tp5431510p5452178.html Sent from the Great Britain mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
