Am 11.12.2013 um 16:12 schrieb Pieren <pier...@gmail.com>: > > "This proposal does not replace, deprecate or obsolete the already > existing and well known tags“
Everybody agrees on that. The old tags still stay valid. > > Don't expect that renderers have to change since the proposal states > clearly "it's not necessary“. I do not understand this conclusion. If we agree by voting on new tags - even if their use is only recommended and not mandatory (how could anything be mandatory in OSM?) - so if we agree that we can and should use the new tags, how can you conclude that „it’s not necessary“ to render them? This is a complete non-sense. Tagging something which than will not be rendered, what is this for??? I really do not understand. Either there is a problem with the tagging - then everybody should agree to improve it. Or there is a problem with rendering this tagging - which somebody should maybe explain me. Is it technically so difficult to render both tagging schemes? Is this situation satisfying for anybody? nounours _______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
