Thanks for the explanation, Pieren. I understand your view. But it looks colored by „I’ve always been against this proposal“ to me. What’s happening now is what you feared, and why you were against. Maybe you should have been followed. Maybe fearing something might help creating it ...
I did not take part in these discussions, and so I am missing probably some important bits. But as an outsider, I would understand: ==>> If we vote for a new feature, and do not deprecate the old one, both would be equally valid and thus both should be supported by renderers and editors. If I’m coding, I will obviously use the new one. I think everybody on the street not being of OSM (or an OSM-newbe) would understand it this way. If my understanding is wrong, than the wiki should be changed, the proposal should be removed or whatever. From the voting date I conclude that the „Grand Public Transport War" has taken place 2.5 years ago. Would it not be time to make peace? I see a lot of arguments in favor of making peace, looking ahead, but I currently do not see any objective reason to go on with this situation. I really have no opinion on which scheme is better, the old or the new. I find PublicTransportMapping difficult, but the problem for me are not the stops. So it does not really matter to me. The relation and master_route actually looks like an improvement to me, and I think making hierarchical relations (not knowing the potential technical problems behind) like discussed here https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-transit/2013-December/001645.html would help! (you wrote once " The method of how routes relations are already breaking highways is already stupid but that's another story. -- Pieren 14:26, 31 March 2011 (BST)“ - maybe hierarchical routes is something you can align to? Anybody for making peace and going on improve PT? Nounours Am 11.12.2013 um 16:32 schrieb Pieren <pier...@gmail.com>: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 4:25 PM, nounours77 > >> I really do not understand. > > I will tell it differenty : > why the renderers should support two tags for the same feature if it's > not to deprecate one of them ? > or > why the proposal claims to not replace or deprecate previous tags and > we get complains later that the new ones are ignored ? > > Pieren > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-transit mailing list > Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
_______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
