The things that make it not OSI compliant are: 1) an application with more than 700 million monthly active users (i.e. Google, Bing, Amazon, and Apple) require getting a licence 2) some moral restrictions (like criminal acts)
I can live with that... ../Dave On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 at 05:39, Evan Leibovitch via talk <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 10:47 AM Colin McGregor via talk <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> As noted last evening I am running the open source (but NOT GPL) Llama >> 2 AI on a Raspberry PI 5. > > > As discussed at the meeting Tuesday night, Llama 2 is *not* Open Source. > It conforms to neither the OSI Open Source Definition nor the FSF Four > Freedoms. > This post from IBM explains how and why it's not: > https://www.ibm.com/topics/llama-2#Is+Llama+2+open+source? > > While the license is broadly open, it's not open source or free software > in much the same way as the Creative Commons "NC" license is not; it > restricts use and requires certain entities to get a paid license. > > - Evan > > --- > Post to this mailing list [email protected] > Unsubscribe from this mailing list > https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk >
--- Post to this mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
