Hi Reeva, You mentioned that Firefox and Chrome are not tracking properly for you. I would expect this issue in Chrome, as it is not officially supported. But, could you please provide examples of where this is happening in Firefox?
Regarding the unresponsiveness you mention, we are working on the first maintenance fix that should be out very soon. This has fixes for both the speech and magnification side. This will be forthcoming in the next few weeks. After this release rolls out, I would really like to know if you still experience this issue. Best Regards, Jeremy From: Reeva Webb [mailto:jadedangelpromi...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 4:33 PM To: Jeremy Curry; Window-Eyes Discussion List Subject: Re: Window Eyes and ZoomText or Fusion? Fusion is supposed to cover low vision to no vision? Once someone gets to the very low vision or no vision stage for most people who rely mostly on speech at that point it's about the voice you prefer with the speed,pitch etc. they want/need to hear. I'm not a eloquence or dectalk fan. I hate those synths with the heat of a thousand suns but realize some people actually need them. People with lower vision and hearing issues come to mind who don't know braille. As far as classic vocalizer is concerned. I realize tracking with them may not be perfect. Using firefox and chrome isn't perfect with fusion but i'm willing to take the trade off if i could get jill back. I do like fusion and will most likely end up buying it. It's easy to learn if your already using we or zt. I didn't have to learn a bunch of new hot keys since i had mag/reader on my laptop already. I didn't even have to reset up my zt settings. All i did was change to we key layout and get the apps i had an d i was up and running. I do like that focus actually tracks and the learning center is pretty cool. I knew most of the stuff in it but i like that it has things to learn windows not just fusion. My only complaint outside of no jill is when the screenreader part becomes unresponsive. Restarting fusion to get speech back takes forever. I realize some of this is due to the magnifivation side can y'all do anything to make it not take so long or put in a way to just restart the screen reader side? Reeva On Friday, December 18, 2015, Jeremy Curry via Talk <talk@lists.window-eyes.com<mailto:talk@lists.window-eyes.com>> wrote: There are currently no plans to do this. Thanks, Jeremy -----Original Message----- From: Singing Sparrow [mailto:sunsh...@abe.midco.net<javascript:;>] Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 2:24 PM To: Jeremy Curry; Window-Eyes Discussion List Subject: Re: Window Eyes and ZoomText or Fusion? will neo speech be coming to window eyes? On 12/18/2015 1:03 PM, Jeremy Curry via Talk wrote: > Hi Reeva, > > I am catching up on some of my email today and I wanted to respond to your > question about older synthesizers and ZoomText Fusion. There are several > reasons that we did not include older synthesizers, such as DecTalk Access32. > However, at the top of the list is that many of the older synthesizers do > not allow for speaking and highlighting of text simultaneously. You noted > that the price was worth it for "speech and tracking focus alone." This was > one of the main feature requests we heard for ZoomText Fusion. That is, > users wanted to see everything that they hear. If we were to include older > synthesizers, the user experience would vary from synthesizer to synthesizer, > and most users would think that Fusion would not work when, in reality, it is > because the synthesizers are old and no longer being developed. Thus, we > made the decision to include the latest synthesizers that do support this > technology. Additionally, a very high percentage of ZoomText Fusion users > want a h > uman-sounding synthesizer. Thus, if we included DecTalk or Eloquence, > there are not only very few users who want it, but it would not work with > tracking focus, and the cost of the product would likely need to be higher. > A similar issue exists with the older Vocalizer (that is, NON-expressive) > voices. The tracking would not work and the price of the product would > likely need to be higher. This would give the impression that ZoomText > Fusion did not work as advertised and raise the cost at the same time. I > hope this helps clarify why we selected to include Neospeech and Vocalizer > Expressive, as these synthesizers are able to track everything that is > spoken. In fact, we did a ton of work under the hood to ensure that this > works extremely well with these synthesizers and ZoomText Fusion. > > I hope you are enjoying the ZoomText Fusion trial! > > What are some of the features you like best about it? > > Merry Christmas! > > Jeremy > > Jeremy Curry > Director of Product Management > Ai Squared, Inc. > Phone: (802) 362-3612 > Email: jcu...@aisquared.com<javascript:;> > Web: www.aisquared.com<http://www.aisquared.com> > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Talk > [mailto:talk-bounces+jcurry<javascript:;>=aisquared....@lists.window-eyes.com<javascript:;>] > On > Behalf Of Reeva Webb via Talk > Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2015 8:53 PM > To: Window-Eyes Discussion List; Loy > Subject: Re: Window Eyes and ZoomText or Fusion? > > I have been using we and zt together for the past year and a half. I'm avout > 2 and a half weeks into my fusion trial and i'm making plans to pay the $400 > to upgrade. It's basically we and zt finally working good together. It's > worth it just for speech and focus actually tracking alone. > Keep in mind this is new software the downsides i'm about to list may change > with updates. The biggest one in my opinion is voices if you are a dectalk or > eloquence fan you'll have to get those voices from a 3rd party as they do not > come with fusion and the versions on the website for sale for we for office > will not work with fusion. If like me you bought/want vocalizer classic > voices like jill as i bought her for we for office at this time you're outta > luck. You get vocalizer expressive tom, ava, samantha and allison and > neospeech kate and paul. Ai2 people if y'all read this PLEASE PLEASE make the > we for office voices available for purchase on the gw site work with fusion. > I know some of this is up to the tts company that licenses the voices to > y'all but y'all are gonna have people like me coming over from using we and > zt as seperate products together who are gonna want dectalk and eloquence or > in my case i bought vocalizer classic for jill for we for office nuance got ri > d of her when they came out with vocalizer expressive. I don't think it's > too much to ask for people who bought voices for we for office or people > coming over from the retail version of we to get to use the voices we paid > for already with fusion. > At this time the chrome web browser is not supported by fusion. The last > downside is if you use the old zt keyboard, the one with the circle buttons > on top. You're gonna have to buy the new zt keyboard the old version does > not work with fusion. I highly suggest downloading the 60 day trial to see if > you like it. It's easy to get used to as there's a we keybord layout and you > can use all the apps from app central. > > Reeva > On Dec 8, 2015 5:36 PM, "Loy via Talk" > <talk@lists.window-eyes.com<javascript:;>> wrote: > >> Any opinions on the ZoomText Fusion versus Window Eyes and ZoomText >> as separate programs. I am trying to decide on upgrading to Fusion >> for >> $99 or purchase the ZoomText upgrade for Windows 10 for $49. I >> primarily use Window Eyes and use ZoomText when I am doing my banking and >> Quicken. >> _______________________________________________ >> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the >> author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. >> >> For membership options, visit >> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/jadedan >> g >> elpromises%40gmail.com<http://40gmail.com> >> . >> For subscription options, visit >> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com >> List archives can be found at >> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com >> > _______________________________________________ > Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author > and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. > > For membership options, visit > http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/jcurry%40aisquared.com. > For subscription options, visit > http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com > List archives can be found at > http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author > and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. > > For membership options, visit > http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/sunshine%40abe.midco.net. > For subscription options, visit > http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com > List archives can be found at > http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com > > _______________________________________________ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/jadedangelpromises%40gmail.com. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com _______________________________________________ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/archive%40mail-archive.com. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
