It always was, at least since they became Greedom.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 17, 2016, at 6:08 PM, Kim Lingo via Talk <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Are there already a lot of things that Window-Eyes doesn't work well with? 
> Speaking of "the shark", I rather liked Freedom Science Fiction, or Bleed 'Em 
> Scientific, or one I came up with "Free-dumb" Scientific.
> Kim Lingo
> 
> 
> -----Original Message----- From: Sky Mundell via Talk
> Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2016 3:21 PM
> To: 'Bryan Peterson' ; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
> Subject: RE: Window-Eyes is Dead!
> 
> Your right about JAWS now that it is under VFO
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Talk [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Bryan Peterson via Talk
> Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2016 3:15 PM
> To: Veronica Smith
> Cc: Window-Eyes Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
> 
> Because the Shark is a piece of crap. I used it for ten or twelve years
> before I switched to WE and hated it. I will never go back.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Dec 17, 2016, at 3:09 PM, Veronica Smith <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> 
>> Why not use the shark? I've only ever used WE so don't know much about
>> that fish. Tell me why or why not. V
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Talk
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On
>> Behalf Of Bryan Peterson via Talk
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 3:19 AM
>> To: Tom Kingston; Pamela Dominguez; Window-Eyes Discussion List
>> Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
>> 
>> I for one have already been working on getting more familiar with
>> NVDA, mostly because for the life of me I still cannot get my version
>> of WE to read documents in Word 2010 despite trying the steps in the
>> various related articles in the knowledge base and NVDA will read
>> them. I do hope that WE will continue to be around but I'm preparing
>> for the worst by trying to learn NVDA. I absolutely will not go back to
> using the Shark.
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tom Kingston via Talk
>> Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 10:52 PM
>> To: Pamela Dominguez ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
>> Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
>> 
>> Pam,
>> 
>> User windows are a very powerful feature that are really more or less
>> scripting in another form. Unfortunately everyone ignored them because
>> they weren't called scripting.
>> 
>> You can create standard windows relative to screen coordinates or
>> floating windows that automatically adjust their coordinates based on
>> several different things. You can make them speak with a hot key or
>> make them speak automatically or make them silent. You can tie them to
>> specific colors, have them watch for highlighting, or not, and on and on.
>> 
>> Then there are hyperactive windows. These monitor the defined area in
>> many different ways and can react in many different ways, e.g. say
>> something, speak a window, execute a hot key, load a set file, and on
>> and on.
>> 
>> I remember how everyone was so excited when scripting was introduced.
>> I only shook my head thinking we had a lot of that power from the
>> beginning through these windows. It was amazing how some jumped on
>> scripting while prior to its introduction everyone seemed to scream
>> and run every time I mentioned user windows.
>> 
>> You won't even see them in the control panel unless "Show advanced
>> options" is checked under the Help menu.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Tom
>> 
>> 
>>> On 11/28/2016 8:51 PM, Pamela Dominguez via Talk wrote:
>>> Okay, at the risk of sounding stupid:  what are these user windows
>>> you are talking about?  pam.
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message----- From: Dave via Talk
>>> Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2016 6:10 PM
>>> To: [email protected] ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
>>> Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
>>> 
>>> I Miss a big big feature  that is no longer in the version 9.X of
>>> Window eyes.  I use those User Windows, in a couple of Set Files I've
>>> created for a couple of programs I use.  Without those User Windows,
>>> Window Eyes 9.x does not give me the same abilities as Window Eyes
>>> 8.X This for the way I use Window Eyes is going backwards.
>>> 
>>> This next one is a personal preference, but the way version 9.X Copies
>>> Text on the Internet is not to my liking.    It is not Windows Standard.
>>> I find the New way to copy text a bit Funky, and I tend to get more
>>> text than I want.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I dislike other minor issues in Version 9.X, and so it isn't a matter
>>> of going backwards, but more of a consistency issue.
>>> 
>>> I suspect the problem I occasionally have is a Script problem, and
>>> not so much a Window Eyes problem.  From time to time, I have major
>>> problems using Gold Wave 6 in Windows 10.
>>> 
>>> I no longer have the ability to Read to End when reading Email in Becky.
>>> 
>>> When in File Explorer, I cannot use the Send To feature because
>>> either the Script is not reading what Drives I have available, or
>>> Windows 10 is not displaying the Drives.
>>> 
>>>> From time to time, the drives are read by Window Eyes, but only one
> time.
>>> If I want to send another file, then the Drives no longer are shown,
>>> or read by Window Eyes 9.5.
>>> 
>>> This last problem started after downloading the Anniversary Edition
>>> of Windows 10.
>>> 
>>> These last three issues are probably Script issues.  Either they did
>>> not load correctly, or once loaded, failed to work properly.  But, if
>>> there is no more development on Window Eyes, it is small stuff like
>>> this that never will be fixed. And it is little stuff like this that
>>> will force me to buy JAWS or some other Screen Reader.
>>> 
>>> I find the operation of the Mouse to be very different in 9.X than I
>>> did in 8.X.  this too has more to do with consistency, because there
>>> are times I can use the Mouse, but too much of the time, it doesn't
>>> work or read as well as it did in 8.X.
>>> 
>>> I also had a Big disappointment, and a Complaint about the Bugginess of
>>> the 9.0, 9.1,9.2, 9.3 etc.    In my opinion, none of these editions were
>>> quite ready for paying customers.   Not until 9.4 and 9.5 did I feel
>>> that Window Eyes 9 had gotten reliable enough to be sold to the
>>> general public and to existing Customers.
>>> 
>>> I could very well be wrong, but I thought the  decision to ship 9.0
>>> to the Market was a  choice made by the drastic need for Money.
>>> 
>>> This is taking advantage of your Customers, and while a lot of
>>> Software Companies do this, it doesn't make it Right, or enjoyable
>>> for those of us who buy upgrades.
>>> 
>>> If I took more time, I could probably come up with a few more items,
>>> but I have made my point.
>>> 
>>> Grumpy Dave
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the
>> author
>> 
>> and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
>> 
>> For membership options, visit
>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/bpeterso
>> n2000%
>> 40cableone.net.
>> For subscription options, visit
>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>> List archives can be found at
>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the
>> author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
>> 
>> For membership options, visit
>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/madison_
>> tewe%4
>> 0spinn.net.
>> For subscription options, visit
>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>> List archives can be found at
>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author
> and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
> 
> For membership options, visit
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/skyt%40shaw.ca
> .
> For subscription options, visit
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> List archives can be found at
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
> and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
> 
> For membership options, visit 
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/banjopapa03%40gmail.com.
> For subscription options, visit 
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> List archives can be found at 
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com 
> _______________________________________________
> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
> and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
> 
> For membership options, visit 
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/bpeterson2000%40cableone.net.
> For subscription options, visit 
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> List archives can be found at 
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/archive%40mail-archive.com.
For subscription options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

Reply via email to