One thing some people may have forgotten or were not on board with WE early enough was thay they also charged extra for pro versions of Window-Eyes. It seems to me that it was at least $100 more than the standard version because I did not have pro and a friend did. When the time came that I needed pro, I did have to find the money to do so. The difference between the two companies is that all upgrades cost the same for WE and JFW charges more for the pro version upgrades.

Carol


On 4/28/2018 1:11 AM, Sky Mundell via Talk wrote:
Hello Lynn. I agree with you that we shouldn't call anybody names. I think the 
problem with FS that people have is the fact they have a stranglehold in 
education and and the fact you have to pay extra for home and pro. That was one 
of the reasons I went to Window-Eyes. But yes, they were indeed running out of 
money, even though Window-Eyes had been around for 23 years, and the lawsuit 
that FS filed contributed to this..

-----Original Message-----
From: Talk [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of lynn white via Talk
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2018 9:51 PM
To: bj colt via Talk
Cc: lynn white
Subject: Re: `news about jws

I don't get calling a company such silly names.  I have always wished
that they would be subscription based.  You will spend the same money
but in smaller bites.


It's understandable that subscriptions aren't for everyone.  When
Microsoft started such programs, I don't recall calling their approach
the names that you call Freedom Scientific.


Plus, we all forget that, as great as Window-Eyes was, they simply were
running out of money.


On 4/27/2018 9:27 AM, bj colt via Talk wrote:
Hi Folks,

I recieved an email this morning and it informed me that jws is going to become 
a subscription based product. Now it all makes sense, getting rid of the 
opposition first. No or very little competittion. This will be interesting how 
it is going to work?

I'm not going to say how I feel inside but needless to say corrupt, evil 
sociopathic Narsasists come to mind.

I genuinly and sincerely hope that as many blind people don't subscribe.

Live long and prosper, John
_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/lynnwhite360%40radioforlife.info.
For subscription options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/skyt%40shaw.ca.
For subscription options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/carogsmith%40embarqmail.com.
For subscription options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com


_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/archive%40mail-archive.com.
For subscription options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

Reply via email to