Lots of silly comments on this list.  Who came to whom regarding the 
merger?  That is not a rhetorical question.  I am asking sincerely.  Who 
broached whom?

On 4/28/2018 7:18 AM, Tony C via Talk wrote:
> If you think the price is going to decrease, you are living in a dream 
> world. The whole reason of getting rid of WE was to have a "choke-hold" 
> on screen reader users.
> 
> -----Original Message----- From: bj colt via Talk
> Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2018 4:03 AM
> To: Window-Eyes Discussion List
> Cc: bj colt
> Subject: Re: `news about jws
> 
> Hi Lynn,
> 
> My apologies if the names I called those at the top of the tree in VFO
> offended you. My sheer anger and frustration has overwhelmed me. It is
> rarely I make such statements and more so on this list. I've never been so
> angry or upset at a situation where blind people will be forced to pay much
> more than they are just now. Please believe me it won't be the same 
> price as
> now. That I can guarantee. Just look at the price of Microsoft windows 365
> office. Remember, that is not just for one or two years. that is for life.
> When we bought a copy of Office that copy lasted and will last for years.
> I'm still using a 2007 copy of office on my windows 7 machine. If I had 
> paid
> a monthly subscription for that length of time. I could have bought at 
> least
> 8 copied of office.
> 
> I could say a lot more Lynn regarding the merger and subsequent demise of
> Window-eyes. Call it conspiracy theory or not. Had this happened in the up
> they would have been referred to the Monopolies commission. I don't
> apologies for using those names because that is how I feel towards them.
> Them meaning those at the top. Not the employees. I am not normally this 
> way
> about things and don't easily get annoyed. People that know me would agree
> with that. I hate to see blind or disabled people getting ripped off and
> treated the way we are.
> 
> I recently learned that companies who produce adaptive technology for the
> disabled and blind get government grants. How much I have no idea. I have a
> copy of jws and will continue to use window-eyes till I can't use it any
> more.
> 
> Live long and prosper, John
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the 
> author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
> 
> For membership options, visit 
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/tch828%40mediacombb.net.
>  
> 
> For subscription options, visit 
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> List archives can be found at 
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> _______________________________________________
> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the 
> author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
> 
> For membership options, visit 
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/nicksarames%40msn.com.
>  
> 
> For subscription options, visit 
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> List archives can be found at 
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> .
> 
_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/archive%40mail-archive.com.
For subscription options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

Reply via email to