Absolutely.  The clients should have been given the right to choose what
they could get.
-----Original Message-----
From: Talk [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Loy Green via Talk
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2018 3:24 PM
To: Window-Eyes Discussion List
Cc: Loy Green
Subject: Re: `news about jws

FS had an advantage over Window Eyes because for many years VR would only
purchase JAWS and no one  had  the right to choose which screen reader  they
could get. 
----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Nick Sarames via Talk 
  To: Window-Eyes Discussion List 
  Cc: Nick Sarames 
  Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2018 2:21 PM
  Subject: Re: `news about jws


  Lots of silly comments on this list.  Who came to whom regarding the 
  merger?  That is not a rhetorical question.  I am asking sincerely.  Who 
  broached whom?

  On 4/28/2018 7:18 AM, Tony C via Talk wrote:
  > If you think the price is going to decrease, you are living in a dream 
  > world. The whole reason of getting rid of WE was to have a "choke-hold" 
  > on screen reader users.
  > 
  > -----Original Message----- From: bj colt via Talk
  > Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2018 4:03 AM
  > To: Window-Eyes Discussion List
  > Cc: bj colt
  > Subject: Re: `news about jws
  > 
  > Hi Lynn,
  > 
  > My apologies if the names I called those at the top of the tree in VFO
  > offended you. My sheer anger and frustration has overwhelmed me. It is
  > rarely I make such statements and more so on this list. I've never been
so
  > angry or upset at a situation where blind people will be forced to pay
much
  > more than they are just now. Please believe me it won't be the same 
  > price as
  > now. That I can guarantee. Just look at the price of Microsoft windows
365
  > office. Remember, that is not just for one or two years. that is for
life.
  > When we bought a copy of Office that copy lasted and will last for
years.
  > I'm still using a 2007 copy of office on my windows 7 machine. If I had 
  > paid
  > a monthly subscription for that length of time. I could have bought at 
  > least
  > 8 copied of office.
  > 
  > I could say a lot more Lynn regarding the merger and subsequent demise
of
  > Window-eyes. Call it conspiracy theory or not. Had this happened in the
up
  > they would have been referred to the Monopolies commission. I don't
  > apologies for using those names because that is how I feel towards them.
  > Them meaning those at the top. Not the employees. I am not normally this

  > way
  > about things and don't easily get annoyed. People that know me would
agree
  > with that. I hate to see blind or disabled people getting ripped off and
  > treated the way we are.
  > 
  > I recently learned that companies who produce adaptive technology for
the
  > disabled and blind get government grants. How much I have no idea. I
have a
  > copy of jws and will continue to use window-eyes till I can't use it any
  > more.
  > 
  > Live long and prosper, John
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > _______________________________________________
  > Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the 
  > author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
  > 
  > For membership options, visit 
  >
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/tch828%40media
combb.net. 
  > 
  > For subscription options, visit 
  > http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
  > List archives can be found at 
  > http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
  > _______________________________________________
  > Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the 
  > author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
  > 
  > For membership options, visit 
  >
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/nicksarames%40
msn.com. 
  > 
  > For subscription options, visit 
  > http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
  > List archives can be found at 
  > http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
  > .
  > 
  _______________________________________________
  Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

  For membership options, visit
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/loyrg2845%40gm
ail.com.
  For subscription options, visit
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
  List archives can be found at
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/skyt%40shaw.ca
.
For subscription options, visit
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/archive%40mail-archive.com.
For subscription options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

Reply via email to