On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 07:06:20PM +0200, Inge Wallin wrote: > Yes, but it would be good if we planned for at least some of the subsequent > levels right from the start.
I support this idea - I would call them levels as some areas might work
completely different. I would call the different completenesses like
roadcomplete
cyclewaycomplete
roadnamecomplete
landusecomplete
etc ... I have no idea about the granularity but in the end it comes
down to a map never containing ALL interesting data but it would be
interesting to note which subset it contains or is complete.
The completeness is more or less a feeling of the primary mapper of
this specific area so it should be taken with a grain of salt i guess.
But this information would be interesting for a map bug tracker which
could assign higher prioritys to bugs in "complete" areas or even refuse
to accept bugs in incomplete areas.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-171-2280134
Those who would give up a little freedom to get a little
security shall soon have neither - Benjamin Franklin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
