On 12/05/2008 21:02, Cartinus wrote: > On Monday 12 May 2008 21:16:38 David Earl wrote: >> So I think Inge is right - we need different measures for our own use. >> But on the public map, all streets with names seems a pretty good >> achievable and useful thing to show. > > I don't think it is a good idea to call that just "complete". I think it > should be made very clear that it is just the road network that is complete > and not the map.
Fine. > With the import of the AND data the road network in the Netherlands is mostly > complete. Now we often hear: "Why do you still need to map more? It is > complete with the AND data, isn't it?" > > Having more levels or categories of completeness makes it clear that we are > not finished yet after we put the roads in the database. I think we are violently agreeing here! David _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk