Freek recently created this image which shows how much of the AND data is untouched: http://www.vanwal.nl/osm/author_density_nl_20080502_full.png(warning 3 MB image). I think the z18 idea is good idea.
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:36 PM, David Earl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/05/2008 21:02, Cartinus wrote: > > On Monday 12 May 2008 21:16:38 David Earl wrote: > >> So I think Inge is right - we need different measures for our own use. > >> But on the public map, all streets with names seems a pretty good > >> achievable and useful thing to show. > > > > I don't think it is a good idea to call that just "complete". I think it > > should be made very clear that it is just the road network that is > complete > > and not the map. > > Fine. > > > With the import of the AND data the road network in the Netherlands is > mostly > > complete. Now we often hear: "Why do you still need to map more? It is > > complete with the AND data, isn't it?" > > > > Having more levels or categories of completeness makes it clear that we > are > > not finished yet after we put the roads in the database. > > I think we are violently agreeing here! > > David > > > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
