2009/9/11 Emilie Laffray <[email protected]> > Any ideas why we don't have "quarter" tag? > > > > > Well I mentioned it before, but I really believe that for something like > the French Quarter, it is better to use locality. >
I've always used suburb, but locality might be a good alternative. Another question is: is it better to map quarters as areas or nodes? Somewhere like Paris has distinct boundaries to it arrondisments (which also define post code areas), but in others cities, 'quarters' are more colloquial, used informally, or in the marketing of a city. For instance, in Manchester, there's a map of the city divided into quarters published by the tourism board (http://visitmanchester.com/maps.aspx#citymap_anchor) but most of those boundaries look pretty made up to me (and some of the names as well). So in these cases, it's probably easier to map as a node. But if there is a rough boundary, that's reasonably well understood by locals, but has no legal or physical basis, then is it ok to map that as an area? Frankie -- Frankie Roberto Experience Designer, Rattle 0114 2706977 http://www.rattlecentral.com
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
