On 12 April 2010 13:21, Johann H. Addicks <[email protected]> wrote: > > military, but it is used/guarded by them. It would surprise me if there > are > > no signs to tell you it is something to do by the military. > > There are nice echelon sites in germany which just have high fences and > signs > warning about high voltage. > But plate stating something about military or use by gouvernmental > agencies. > not even warnings about armed guards. > Even on the doorbell does not give a slightest hint... > > http://www.addicks.net/albums/Irgendwo/DSCF2103.jpg > > This is a good example to my cute bunny farm story (although your example is not so fluffy and cute). So I think we cannot mark it as landuse=military without some other source (referenced using source=*). Perhaps then it is landuse=industrial with access=private. Are there any tags for dangerous areas? I can only think of the jokes along the lines of landowner=angry shotgun=yes for when you get shouted at trying to follow a public footpath (in the UK they can cross fields but sometimes end up wrongly sign posted or the farmer doesn't know/acknowledge/accept them).
Regarding the demand to translate the whole thread in 24 hours, I point them to http://translate.google.com/ <http://translate.google.com/#> as I have had to use when reading a few forum posts. But as we see, the automatic translation given is not very helpful and I think it's really not helping issues here. If anyone had the money (and I don't see why they should have to spend it) to pay a professional translator, then I think 24 hours would be a very difficult time to organise it (and while the thread continues to grow!). -- Gregory [email protected] http://www.livingwithdragons.com
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
