On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 8:16 PM, John Smith <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 7 June 2010 23:39, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote: > > Either way, I could see someone going around removing uuid=* tags from > > places where they couldn't find the QR code in the store window. > > UUIDs aren't just so you can slap a QR code in some shop window Just to clarify, I don't mean to imply that they'd be right, just that I could see it happening. > Also just because something isn't > on the ground shouldn't mean it should be deleted just because someone > is overly zealot about only having things in the database that are on > the ground, otherwise we might as well start deleting half the state > and country borders that have nothing on the ground. > To be clear, I agree. > If you want to interlink databases, eg wikipedia, you would simply > extend upon the work I've done for UUID to OSM object lookup table, > you'd add one more table and then use the UUID as the key field and > link other object IDs from other databases to it. > Do you have a link? I'm not familiar with that proposal.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
