>What would make OSM successful in your eyes? > >I thought one of the goals was to have OSM used more widely?
This is the right type of question but you need to create an even more basic understanding: I haven't seen a common understanding of the definition of OSM's success. Where did you find the goal of a wider use? Wider use by consumers, companies, NGOs? A wider use in the sense of deriving more special interest maps? A wider use in sense of market share compared to TeleAtlas, Navteq and Google? Regards, Oliver -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Candidacy-AGM-Foundation-2010-Girona-tp5244442p5251898.html Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
