On 10 August 2010 14:49, John Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 10 August 2010 23:44, Florian Lohoff <[email protected]> wrote: > > In case i dont care and like PD more than CC-BY-SA or even worse the ODbl > i would > > be more than happy to continue with CC-BY-SA and accept it to fail in > court, > > basically putting the OSM Data into PD ... > > I never really got that, pro-PD people are pro-ODBL because copyright > may not be enough to cover the database... > > It could be that those pro-PD people actually cares more about the project than pushing an ideology. I would like to point out that there are other major pro-PD who are against ODbL, because of the SA requirements. It is just that most of the vocal pro-PD on those lists care more about getting data than none. Yes, there are compromises towards those people but the license is a SA BY license ultimately. Emilie Laffray
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
