2010/8/10 Peter Körner <[email protected]>: > > > Am 10.08.2010 16:02, schrieb John Smith: >> >> If it won't end up PD why the limitation in the CTs? > > To keep the door open for the futuer. Nobody knows what will come. Are your > problems that you don't trust the LWG? Then go on and do a fork -- it's that > easy. >
Peter, it is not about trust. It is about simple problem that it makes any data which sources require attribution or/and share alike incompatible with new CT. It is/was reasonable to complain about this to LWG and I hope to hear clear answer on this from them soon. It is a paradox that while I can submit data which are attribution and/or share-alike compatible, CT forbids me to do so because I can't promise that license will be kept that way in these aspects. I understand wishes to get OSM under PD in the future, but that ain't gonna happen this way. Cheers, Peter. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
