On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 03:13:02PM +0200, Peter Körner wrote: > Am 10.08.2010 13:38, schrieb Ed Avis: >> Frederik Ramm<frederik<at> remote.org> writes: >> >>> Because for us, your plannet import along with your steadfast refusal of >>> the new >>> license, only causes more work and more problems. >> >> That is true. But then for those who would prefer to continue with CC-BY-SA, > Didn't you read? There is no way in continuing with CC-BY-SA as CC-BY-SA > can't be used for databases. It is just not possible, damn!
In case i dont care and like PD more than CC-BY-SA or even worse the ODbl i would be more than happy to continue with CC-BY-SA and accept it to fail in court, basically putting the OSM Data into PD ... All of this is unproven but i'd rather take that risk than to lock us into even more legal binding documents which are unproven aswell. Flo -- Florian Lohoff [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
