On 10 August 2010 23:32, Stefan de Konink <[email protected]> wrote: > Why is this again a statement of making OSM more restrictive, while the hole > transition was invented to be less restrictive on the OSM data ;) Paradox?
The transition is from more free for contributors to less free for contributors so end users can go from less free to more free, it's inherently wrong to state this will make things more free, it will only be more free for end users of the data. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
