Frederik Ramm wrote:
All these things could be fixed with time if there was sufficient
interest but it will require a lot of work and perseverance.
For now, I suggest that you keep your separate database. You can link
your objects to OSM objects by their ID if you want, and process the
daily change files to be alerted of changes in the objects of interest
to you.
So you are advocating that we all create our own private versions of OSM with
our own data in them?
I see another reason for a split and a new version of the database just for
users who ARE looking for historic data :) Perhaps under yet another licence ;)
The tags to handle historic mapping have been around long enough to be
practically used. We just need people to start using them and understand why
some of the information MAY actually be useful even on current maps. Any
software accessing the data should already be taking note of the star_date and
end_date anyway ...
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk//
Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
