OSM is an open system. Anyone can contribute as he likes.
If there is something wrong then you cannot say "must be reverted" It's the original author that should be convinced to revert data. Only none cooperative authors should "have their date reverted" All OSM-ers are equal, nor Pieren nor Frederik are more equal. Gert Gremmen ----------------------------------------------------- Openstreetmap.nl (alias: cetest) P Before printing, think about the environment. Van: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Namens Pieren Verzonden: Friday, December 17, 2010 12:27 PM Aan: Richard Fairhurst CC: [email protected] Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk] Massive import of airports On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Richard Fairhurst < [email protected]> wrote: The legal discussion makes only sense if the import is going to be accepted. And since it is not the first import about airports in OSM, this one will create more troubles than anything else. I agree with Frederik that it should be reverted. It's not because some geodata can be downloaded (freely or not) from somewhere that they can stupidly imported in OSM without any regards about existing data. Such things were possible 4 years ago, not anymore today. Pieren
<<image001.gif>>
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
