I think you mean t-shirt, made me smile anyway. Phil --
Sent from my Nokia N9 On 09/11/2012 20:08 deng dongpo wrote: Hi Jeff and all I heard that the SteveC considered an address is high priority for making OSM more usable from Dan Cooke, who is a keynote in ACM GeoCrowd. http://www.geocrowd.eu/workshop_2012/ Coincidentally, Taiwan OSM community is running a map contest on how many addresses mappers make after SotM this year in Japan. This is because a T-shit received from OSM Japan after SotM. In order to send this T-shit to Taiwan mappers, we started the map contest. http://www.geocrowd.eu/workshop_2012/ Few people registered this contest, but many TW mappers are attracted to make address on the map. I would not say that this contest is successful. At least, we encouraged more Taiwanese mappers to give address data. Cheers, Dongpo On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Jeff Meyer <[email protected]> wrote: > At SOTM US 2012, SteveC mentioned addressing as a high priority for making > OSM more usable, etc. > > Does anyone have a primer on best practices for improving OSM addressing > quality quickly & efficiently? > > For example, I like to walk around my hood, drawing houses & adding house > numbers, but that strikes me as inefficient for making any significant > impact (although it is strangely therapeutic) on a larger scale. Should we > be marking block numbers, etc., to provide a max / min for each block? > > Thanks, > Jeff > > > -- > Jeff Meyer > Global World History Atlas > www.gwhat.org > [email protected] > 206-676-2347 > > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.geocrowd.eu/workshop_2012/ > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://www.geocrowd.eu/workshop_2012/
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
