On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com> wrote:
> But perhaps most critically of all, before iD becomes the default, are the > issues of damaging relations and "oneway=yes" tagged ways: > https://github.com/systemed/iD/issues/1461 > https://github.com/systemed/iD/issues/299 > iD 1.1 displays relationship memberships in the sidebar much like P2 does. We plan to add additional functionality (e.g. highlighting routes on the map, visual rendering of turn restrictions) in future versions, but feel that 1.1 makes relations visible enough to sufficiently address the concern of unintentional damage. As has been discussed before, we are not planning to add intrusive "Are you sure?" warnings to iD. Such second-guessing disrupts legitimate workflows and turns away new users, who typically already feel anxiety about doing something wrong. With regards to way reversal, as outlined in the issue you linked, we believe iD's behavior is correct and optimal. If you have a specific concern that hasn't been discussed, please raise it on the issue tracker. Otherwise, again, let's avoid rehashing the previous discussion. Thanks, John
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
