doesn't surprise me. check this https://docs.mapbox.com/mapbox-gl-js/example/attribution-position/ plenty of space for visible attribution, well mapbox attribution is not hidden under an "i". I have reported another client of theirs that I have reached out to ask for attribution, which they understood, but still haven't fixed it. let's see if mapbox is in good will.
On Wed, 25 Dec 2019, 17:20 · Michael Medina, <[email protected]> wrote: > As a native English speaker this reads as complete stonewalling on > Mapbox’s part. I don’t know why OSM doesn’t just file a DMCA complaint > against Mapbox or deny them access. The OSM board should also not have to > go through the regular help channel to get answers. Mapbox should escalate > this issue to their top administrators. I know the board likes to play > nice, but Mapbox isn’t playing nice so no reason to as far as I can tell. > > Michael Medina > > On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 04:06 <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Send talk mailing list submissions to >> [email protected] >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> [email protected] >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> [email protected] >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of talk digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Re: [Osmf-talk] Attribution guideline status update >> (Nuno Caldeira) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 17:52:53 +0000 >> From: Nuno Caldeira <[email protected]> >> To: Mateusz Konieczny <[email protected]> >> Cc: joost schouppe <[email protected]>, OSMF Talk >> <[email protected]>, OpenStreetMap talk mailing list >> <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [Osmf-talk] Attribution guideline status >> update >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed" >> >> Hi Mateusz, >> >> >> They don't. Here's all my email exchange with them from October 2018, >> yes _*2018*_. it's more than enough with evidence and time to be fixed. >> >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/110XubCe0kd2HNtbqXS7U_vr44xyieaSt/view?usp=sharing >> >> >> On 24/12/2019 07:08, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: >> > Have they responded with anything >> > (except automatic reply) ? >> > >> > Is there an assigned issue id? >> > >> > >> > 23 Dec 2019, 21:32 by [email protected]: >> > >> > I sent this situation to Mapbox 10 months ago. >> > >> > On Mon, 23 Dec 2019, 17:00 joost schouppe, >> > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> > >> > >> > As an xmas bonus, here's another Facebook company (via >> > Mapbox), Snapchat that is using OSM without attribution >> > requirements (funnily there's plenty of space for a >> > reasonable and visible calculated mapbox logo and text). >> > They probably don't know, nor that they have been asked to >> > comply over a year ago, nor have agreed with the license >> > in every aspect of it when stated using OSM data, nor read >> > Mapbox TOS, or Mapbox been informed on these repeated >> > offenders, nor read the multiples reports in mailing >> > lists, nor that they had a employee that ran for OSMF board. >> > >> > https://map.snapchat.com/ >> > >> > Let's continue to be hypocrites and pretend nothing is >> > going on for over a year with these two companies that are >> > corporate members of OSMF and should be the first ones to >> > give examples. Enough with excuses. >> > >> > >> > The Snapchat case is a pretty clear example of how not to do >> > things. If there's space for Mapbox, there's space for >> > OpenStreetMap. But I don't think Snapchat has anything to do >> > with Facebook. >> > >> > Phil, I hope you contacted them directly and not through >> Facebook. >> > >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: < >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20191224/e4cbcf8f/attachment.htm >> > >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Subject: Digest Footer >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> End of talk Digest, Vol 184, Issue 39 >> ************************************* >> > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
